I was in the shower this morning and an item on the radio news made me think of our Pledge of Allegiance.
“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
I was thinking the Pledge arose in the aftermath of the Civil War when Southerners were required to swear loyalty oaths to regain citizenship. Many Southerners, did not.
After a bit of research, I was surprised to learn that our current Pledge arose in the late 19th Century. It was originally drafted by Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a progressive—what we would call today a socialist.
You can follow the links to read about Bellamy and his socialists views. I do not subscribe to his politics, nor, if they knew of them, would many today—except for democrats.
There have been three versions of the Pledge, the original one, another from 1923 and our current version that was adopted in 1954. I can remember the controversy when the words, “under God,” was added. The atheists complained, as expected, that it violated the Constitution. When asked to provide chapter and verse, they could not. But there is one word that is common in all of the versions, the word, “indivisible.”
I attended a meeting earlier this week. The meeting opened, as are many such meetings, with a Prayer and the Pledge. As I recited the Pledge, we said, “…one nation, indivisible, with…” It struck me that we are no longer ‘indivisible’ and have not been for more than 50 years. We are a nation of factions, no longer united.
In my opinion, the trend started with FDR’s New Deal. (Most current histories of the New Deal fail to mention that large portions of it were later declared unconstitutional and the measures, instead of ending the depression, extended it for more than eight years.) The divisions accelerated with Johnson’s Great Society. Now, with Obama in office, divisive policies have been used to widen the divisions in the country to maintain political power of the administration and to lessen that of their opponents.
Is the Pledge of Allegiance still valid? I would like to believe it is, but there is that niggling thought that it is no longer valid and has not been for some time.
Look around us at the divisions that exists just within the Republican Party. The Karl Roves of the establishment plot against conservatives and the non-establishment ‘Pubs, the so-called ‘moderates’ like John McCain and Lindsey Graham vote against their fellow party members and actively support the party’s political opponents. Then, add the divisions created by partisan politics, the creation and expansion of the Welfare State that takes from those who produce and gives to those who will not. No, I believe the Pledge is no longer appropriate, no matter how much we wish it was.
FUBAR. That is being used to describe Obamacare. The polite version of FUBAR is Fouled Up Beyond all Repair or Recognition. Of course, there are many other translations of that acronym and all are correct. I came across this article that applies the term in another venue.
October 23rd, 2013 at 10:00 PM
With the White House now hinting agreement with the Republicans who called for a delay in penalizing individuals under the ObamaCare mandate, the disastrous rollout of Barack Obama’s singular signature piece of legislation passed during his presidency can be summed up in one military term (or acronym): FUBAR*.
Notwithstanding the fact that the mainstream media has been near-unanimously stuck on declaring that healthcare.gov’s problems were caused by a mere “glitch,” everything about ObamaCare’s rollout, thus far, has proved to be a disaster of epic proportions. It has lived down to the most dire warnings of becoming a “third-world experience.”
When critics claimed that ObamaCare would cause people to lose their employer-sponsored coverage and that prices would skyrocket, they were heckled and jeered. It turns out, though, they were right.
Despite Obama’s promises to the contrary, millions of Americans are, in fact, losing their health insurance and, based on this chart, most others are seeing their healthcare costs soar.Source Report: How Will You Fare in the Obamacare Exchanges?
In addition to the Administration also trying to hide how many people have actually signed up on the healthcare.gov, CBS News has uncovered a serious pricing problem on the Obamacare site.
…A new online feature can dramatically underestimate the cost of insurance.
The administration announced it would provide a new “shop and browse” feature Sunday, but it’s not giving consumers the real picture. In some cases, people could end up paying double of what they see on the website, CBS News’ Jan Crawford reported Wednesday on “CBS This Morning.” [Emphasis added.]
To make matters worse, in addition to the Obama Administration enlisting ACORN, SEIU and other union allies to become ObamaCare “navigators” at up to $48 per hour, it turns out that many of them haven’t even been certified on how to navigate a Prius let alone ObamaCare.
This is only further complicated by the fact that “cyber squatters” are hijacking private, personal information, according to the Washington Times:
More than 700 websites have been created with names playing off of Obamacare or Healthcare.gov, making it likely that some Americans will mistakenly hand over private information to unknown third-parties.
With all that has happened in the first days of the ObamaCare rollout, it appears that the military term SNAFU will become the norm under ObamaCare.
However, it wasn’t like we didn’t know it was coming, right?
No wonder Jon Stewart is upset.
My post for today is getting a bit long. Here’s a link to a story about the UAW’s drive to unionize a VW plant in Tennessee is being halted by employees who do not want to be unionized! Tennessee is a Right-to-Work state.
By Tim Devaney, The Washington Times, Wednesday, October 23, 2013
A United Auto Workers drive to organize workers at the Volkswagen Passat plant in Tennessee is turning into a critical battle in labor’s drive to breach the wall of foreign automakers who have flocked to the American South and other right-to-work states in recent years to open nonunion plants.
But in a twist of typical labor-management game plan, the UAW fight is not with the German-owned Volkswagen, where some executives have indicated they are more willing to work with the union, but with the plant’s workers, Tennessee state officials and anti-labor advocacy groups who fear the precedent a successful organizing drive could set.